ALLAH YAR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, FAISALABAD
A. XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Temporary Order Prohibition, Canal Authorities Approved Applicants Without Notice to the Applicants, According to Dispute Grants and Applicants in the Water Channel Case, the Trial Court Approved the Temporary Order Prohibition, The appellate court overturned those findings. The authority granted by the trial court in the premises mentioned that the applicants were presented with a legal status, which was not a stand-alone, proof of service, especially of the fact In view of this, when the authorities had not filed any document to establish the service of the applicants. They filed their written statement and filed their response to the request, if, after the applicant was served, it is the responsibility of the authorities to bring the service report on the record and in the section of the notice from which It appears that the applicants have been served, the order of unknown appeal was set aside. And the trial court was restored
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Rawat lawyer
