Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AYUB ALIAS MAHBOOB AHMAD versus STATE


Section 302 (a) (b) definition of evidence, reduction of sentence location was the home of the complainant and the injured prosecutor's witness, who was the son of the complainant and brother of the deceased living with his father / complainant. Both situations were natural, the witness complainant and the prosecution witness had no prior hostility or illicit desire to be included in a false case so that the third eye witness was the brother of the accused's wife. All told that the three witnesses had given a very consistent statement of the incident and confirmed each other. While examining all material points, no contradiction in their statements can be made on the record of this case, nor was it a matter of misidentification, nor, as a substitute, did the accused have any serious connection with the prosecution's witnesses. And they knew very well. The father's existence to actually replace the murderer for an innocent person was fully supported by the statements of the prosecution's witnesses, and the statements of the prosecution's witnesses proved that the medical evidence contained evidence of the recovery of 30 bore pistols. Prosecutions support witness statements, but as the pistol was not sent to the forensic science laboratory, it would not be safe to rely on it. Proof of Recovery The story of the novel, as the defendant described in its defense, was a thought-provoking and unworthy of a credible prosecution, in which circumstances it was successfully proved by a reliable ocular account. Was supported by medical evidence and confirmed by motivations and conditions. The Case Trial Court found that Section 302 (a), 5304 for the offense under PPC, pp.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Ambela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.