MUHAMMAD AYUB ALIAS MAHBOOB AHMAD versus STATE
Section 302 (a) (b) definition of evidence, reduction of sentence location was the home of the complainant and the injured prosecutor's witness, who was the son of the complainant and brother of the deceased living with his father / complainant. Both situations were natural, the witness complainant and the prosecution witness had no prior hostility or illicit desire to be included in a false case so that the third eye witness was the brother of the accused's wife. All told that the three witnesses had given a very consistent statement of the incident and confirmed each other. While examining all material points, no contradiction in their statements can be made on the record of this case, nor was it a matter of misidentification, nor, as a substitute, did the accused have any serious connection with the prosecution's witnesses. And they knew very well. The father's existence to actually replace the murderer for an innocent person was fully supported by the statements of the prosecution's witnesses, and the statements of the prosecution's witnesses proved that the medical evidence contained evidence of the recovery of 30 bore pistols. Prosecutions support witness statements, but as the pistol was not sent to the forensic science laboratory, it would not be safe to rely on it. Proof of Recovery The story of the novel, as the defendant described in its defense, was a thought-provoking and unworthy of a credible prosecution, in which circumstances it was successfully proved by a reliable ocular account. Was supported by medical evidence and confirmed by motivations and conditions. The Case Trial Court found that Section 302 (a), 5304 for the offense under PPC, pp.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Ambela lawyer