Find a Lawyer

JALIL AHMAD SIDDIQUI versus ALI MUHAMMAD

After recording evidence of the plaintiff's Rr 2 and 3 suit for receipt of money on the basis of A. XXXVII, Pro Note, the defendant was provided with five opportunities to present his evidence, including two opportunities for payment of costs, but He could neither pay the costs nor did the production prove that the defendant's defense was closed and the plaintiff's decision was dismissed. Defendant's lawyer claimed that three days before the last date of the hearing, defendant's father had died; he could not present his evidence. No evidence was presented on the record. Until the death of the plaintiff and defendant's father, the appeal was not included with the death certificate or any other relevant document; in the circumstances, there was no justification for postponement of the last date of hearing; There was also no error in searching. Because the results were not given according to the problem, such an error would not invalidate the judgment when it was based on the material on record. Youth cannot be intercepted in the appeal advocate for immigration from Talamba lawyer