Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus STATE

The testimony of section 302 (b) was not only related to the testimony of the two prosecution witnesses, but also to the opportunity witnesses that the matter was reported by the police after the presence of police for about two hours, but no explanation about the delay was recorded. I was not that it was a very material contradiction. Who at the time suspected the presence of both prosecution witnesses, both of the prosecution's witnesses also argued over material points, which cannot be ignored because they were based on the evidence presented by the prosecution. Highlights the quality. Unverified ocular account was not assisted with medical evidence The alleged recovery of the gun did not result in any evacuation because neither the gun was recovered from the site nor the gun was sent to a forensic science laboratory It was to establish whether or not the event was. The case of the unseen incident and the prosecution was filled with suspicion, the appeal was allowed, the trial court ruled that the High Court set aside and the accused was acquitted of the charges and released. list of advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer