Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus STATE

The testimony of the Section 302 evidence was given by both the complainant and the prosecution witness to a permanent account of the incident and despite lengthy scrutiny, they confirmed each other on almost all material points, both of which stated that the prosecution's Witnesses maintained the version described in the FIR complaint, even though she was the victim's husband. And the second witness to the prosecution was the complainant's cousin, but their testimony cannot be dismissed solely on the basis of their relationship with the deceased, the presence of the prosecution witnesses on the occasion, the lawyer for the defendants standing No contradiction was identified between the statements. The witnesses' case was a widespread incident and there was no question of identifying the accused as he was the son-in-law of the complainant and he was also known for the prosecution witness who was the complainant's cousin, for no reason. In the circumstances, the original suspect was present for the replacement of both witnesses' killer statements were completed post mortem by medical evidence The date of the incident within 4/5 hours of the death was alleged by the Prosecution. The suspect was subsequently sued by an account that supported medical evidence and postmortem without delay. As was confirmed by the circumstances. The motions were not in favor of the accused who injured 11 of his mother-in-law, who was his mother-in-law, and an old woman was sentenced and the accused was sentenced to trial, under trial. The court had convicted the offender under a false offense. Section 2302 (a), PPC since the trial court considered the provisions of section 4304 ask a advocate free from Tharo Shah lawyer