Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

Sections 2 ??2 (b) and 4 364 of the testimony were last seen by three prosecutor's witnesses. The testimony of the three witnesses says that despite the lengthy interim investigation, the third witness of the prosecution cannot be disbanded. The testimony of the third witness, however, cannot be taken into account. Under section 161, according to this statement, the PC was recorded 13 days after the incident and no plausible explanation was offered for the delay, although both witnesses of the prosecution were closely related to the complainant. , But the relationship was simply not the basis for the deposition of evidence from witnesses who seemed to have done so. Be natural and truthful witnesses The relationship with the deceased will not be sufficient to eliminate the authenticity of the witness; if evidence is confirmed then the body of the deceased was found on the identity of the accused in the presence of two prosecution witnesses. The witnesses were neutral and their evidence was quite reliable and the retrieval of other articles related to the affidavit also proved to be a late, site plan, which was another piece of circumstantial evidence, which recovered the body and other articles. The location was proven, all the prosecution witnesses have long been subjected to cross-examination, Lee Which defense failed to substantiate his testimony. The prosecution's evidence of competent witnesses was more probable, clear and convincing, while the version taken by the defense was considered impossible, subpoenaed and subsequently, the failure of some of the prosecution's witnesses, the prosecution's fatal. Was not because the prosecution had no liability. You advocate for immigration from Landi Kotal lawyer