MASOOD AHMAD versus STATE
Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 447, 147, 148 and 149 bail, further investigation grants were not available at the time the other accused was located, but they came there later. It was revealed on the Prima Fees that the incident had not been meditated on already. The issue of the commission of the crime in the joint intent proposal needs to be seriously considered; three of the four suspects were injured during the incident, but the fact was prosecuted by prosecutors. ? However, according to the relevant information, the accused were kept on record and the accused also made a counter report on the same incident, under which sections 242424, 4504, 77, ?7, 148 and 149, pp. Under C, a case was registered against the complainant and others. In this case, the role of each of the accused was crucial in deciding the question of bail, the accused, who was alleged to be causing fatal injury to the victim, was not entitled. The bail was exempt, while the case of the other accused was quite prominent. One of the accused was not identified as active role, while the other two were injured during the incident, which is not explained by the prosecution, the case of the accused is under investigation (2). According to Section 497, CR PC, they were approved for bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Samma Satta lawyer