Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

The prosecution case, based on the provisions of Sections 2 (2 (b), & 364A & re 34), placed evidence on completely comfortable circumstances, extending the testimony of two of the prosecution witnesses who had at last presented evidence. The extent of the investigation cannot be deteriorated, the prosecutor's two witnesses said, although it was closely related to the complainant, but their evidence could be relied upon, as the evidence of the relevant witnesses was left out. There was simply no basis for the relationship that otherwise seemed to be a natural and true witness The interesting witness was one who intended to be falsely implicated with the accused. It is not enough to conclude the authenticity of the WOW, if the evidence was recovered from the body of the deceased on the indictment of the accused, in the presence of neutral and reliable prosecution witnesses, the prosecution's story completed the chapel's recovery and the victim's watch. Supports the prosecution case, the prosecution's story also stands with the help of the Medical EO Idence Prosecutor's witnesses, there was no clear reason to make false allegations against the accused between the prosecution's witnesses and the accused. No enmity was proved, eliminating the evidence of the witness's clear and convincing evidence Was no justification for s, all the prosecution witnesses were subjected to test long-range, but the defense failed. There was no reason to dismiss the prosecution's evidence to shake their testimony. The driver of the ambulance, who accompanied the police and brought his body in the ambulance. His statement was also a strong link in the admission of circumstantial evidence. The motive for the crime is a rate jobs for fresh advocates from Lasbela lawyer