Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUHAMMAD ASGHAR versus STATE

Sections 2 302, 319 evidencere and evidence 322 evidence Evidence on the record of evidence shows that the participants of the wedding ceremony were targeted by the deadly weapons firing, who were firing to commemorate the wedding ceremony. The Record further stated that the complainant did not file an FIR, but that his statement was recorded at his residence after a delay of 24 hours and yet he did not nominate the accused in the FIR. Were the statements of other prosecution witnesses recorded after a delay of 10 days, but none of them could be prosecuted for the accused involved in the murder commission? Did not have witnesses. Neither was it named in the FIR nor during the complainant's statement under Section 161, CRPC, according to the prosecution, there were about 200/250 people at the time of the alleged incident, but the prosecution's version No independent witness was presented in support of. , Was closely related to the subpoena, other related defects with the witnesses, my relations also could not be taken into account, though the spectacle was not enough to ruin the deposition of witnesses, but in the case of interesting witnesses the court Evidence had to be appreciated with care and confirmation of evidence, evidence of such interest had to be insisted, and suspicions of closely related witnesses, who were otherwise contradictory and self-contradictory, could not be considered. And they could not be trusted. Defining a witness's credibility is his natural testimony because the worst enemy statement can be considered if it affected trust and if its true value was not determined. best law firm from Silanwala lawyer