Find a Lawyer

ALI ASGHAR versus STATE

Arts 132 (2), 133 and 141 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 458, West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, (XX of 1965), Section 13 Cross-examination The primary purpose of the court when recording the cross-examination. , It was his primary duty. The trial court should be vigilant and properly control the cross examination and make sure that the witness question was understood before answering, the same court should not hurry and it should pay full attention to the witness and the court. It was expected that the questions asked whether the question, whether to present the witness during the cross-examination, was relevant or not should the court be allowed to make lengthy and irrelevant questions for the witness when a murder was committed. If the witness's statement was to be recorded in the trial, the main duty of the trial court was to establish Discuss this way. With the facts of this case, because if the court disagrees with the facts of this case, then it will be impossible to decide, whether the question is relevant or irrelevant and then defense for the defense of the witness is completely at the mercy of counsel. Worse, the long-awaited testing exercise was not made to reveal the truth, but the use of such a method for the manipulation of a mistake should have been discouraged. Was to support the court. Exposing and explaining matters brings the truth to the fore, which is a witness, he may wish to conceal or confuse for the purpose of partnership, to disclose or explain the matter, to separate the fact. No math process was set. Check patent advocate from Murree lawyer