Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR versus FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL

In case of dispute 54 the allotment of plot allotment was allotted to the respondent by the cancellation authority and the possession of the said plot was also conveyed to the defendant. The plot was purchased through a sale agreement by the applicant. As a result, the allotment of the plot in favor of the respondent was canceled on the basis that the fraud was obtained by the plotter through a double allotment / the applicants / vendor said that the cancellation claim was made. He has purchased the plot from the respondent in good faith, as the defendant has no title to the applicant Prior to the cancellation of the designated plot allotted by the defendant, there was no evidence on the plot record in the dispute that the applicant and the defendant were together with the applicant, Under the circumstances, he had previously acquired interest in the suit property. Cancellation Allocation Well, under the circumstances no determination of the Authority can be defeated that the Respondents obtained double allotment by fraud or by concealing the facts and compiling additional matters for the appellate court and the trial court. Remand was not necessary or appropriate. The order approved by the appellate court below is set aside on rev r \ n online advocate from Diamer lawyer