Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

The delay in the further investigation of Section 497 (2), the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), sections 420 and 406, the filing of the FIR was not explained and thereby eliminated the false interference of the accused. The possibility could not be ruled out. After a lapse of fourteen months, through the supplemental statement given by him, the accused involved in the case was on physical remand with the police but there was no recovery, Section 2020 & 6406, P.P.C. , Were not attracted to primary fuse matters. Although the maximum sentence under Sections 420 and 406 was PPC seven years, which was not affected by the section 497 prohibition clause, the CRPC accused was behind bars for the last 6 months, but the trial. I didn't need the accused anymore without any progress. When the challan was presented by the police, keeping the suspects behind bars would be the equivalent of giving them no trial, while a professional assessment of the evidence on the record revealed that there was no evidence. The prosecution is available to link the accused to the commission. The accused's case fell within section 497 (2); CCP being one of the further investigations allowed the accused to be granted bail. female advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer