Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus BURKHA

FIR was filed in the appeal against the eviction of sections 302, 364, 201 and 109 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 421. There was no evidence of a six-month delay in the murder in this case, and prosecutors relied only on evidence of various circumstances to establish their case against the accused. The allegation was legally irreversible because it said the weapon was not smeared. The extra-judicial confession made by the accused was not proven to be a crime because the prosecution did not present the two witnesses who presented the prosecution with the accused, who was allegedly extradited by the accused. The court was admitted. A joint confession that was unacceptable in evidence, the driver of the taxicab cited in the calendar of witness testimony urt, was subjected to enmity The accused could not be prosecuted on the basis of last seen evidence, the deceased was never found dead And in the absence of post-mortem inspection, date, murder, there was no post-mortem examination on record. And even the cause of death could not be ascertained. There was no other conclusive evidence on record to prove his case against the accused beyond any reasonable doubt. It was briefly excluded under section 421, CRPC. advocate for immigration from Dadakhel lawyer