Find a Lawyer

ZAHID HUSSAIN versus STATE

Filing an FIR in section 497 (2) of the Complaints Regulation (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 337a (iii), 337f (i) and guarantee, it is stated that one of the complainant's brothers Was killed and another injured by the accused. The accused / applicant sought bail on grounds. That no recovery was effected by him and that there is a contradiction in the Medico legal report and the account of the account, which can be given to the accused even at the bailout stage. But according to Medico Legal Reports neither the casualties nor the injured suffered a sharp injury. There is a clear cut contradiction in the Medico Legal Reports and the Acquirer account. The suspect was not recovered. The suspect was found innocent during the police investigation. Was found in column number 2, although he was not court-bound. However, in the bail-out phase, the same case was especially relevant when the case related to the accused's innocence was discovered. In the previous bail application filed by the accused, the trial court was instructed that He could go to trial within the stipulated timeframe, but the trial court failed to delay the conclusion. If the case involved a police or a complainant, the court would be obliged to hand over tactics or discourage trial powers to pursue the case financially because of the litigation process. They came to retrieve the accused and to protect him from prolonged and unnecessary detention, requesting bail was granted tax advocates from Khangah Sharif lawyer