KHAN ALIAS KHANI AND ANOTHER versus STATE
Section 302 Convention of Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 121 affirmation of double the evidence, the trial court upheld the death sentence and the sentence were maintained by the High Court. Both courts were justified in rejecting the defense version on the basis that when the witnesses appeared before the trial court, they did not suggest that the defense version was merely at the end of the trial. Was taken and even such a request was not brought before the investigating officer at the appropriate time, both the courts To accept the defense's version version was justified to reject the accused had failed. Prove the petition in terms of Article 121 of the 1984 testimony of the law, accusing the perpetrators of the crime because they brutally killed two people without cause for the fire, killing both the courts. The source concluded that the law was credible and sustainable in the eyes of the law, which led to the reliance on eyewitness statements. Their statements were harmonious, as opposed to interstate. The Supreme Court did not find any reason to reduce the death sentence to life imprisonment as both courts were justified in imposing the death sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Buchay Key lawyer