Find a Lawyer

RAWAT AND OTHERS versus SHAFI MUHAMMAD

Section 24A (2) and O III, R5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Transfer of Applicants to the Case of the Parties on the Transfer of Suits Transfer Services from one court to another Have been received. Documents, matters postponed, notices were issued to the parties who refused to accept the service court after receiving the notice of Belfast, who claimed the service was good and received a fixed suit for proof, according to the respondents' evidence. Suits were settled but they did not appear and the counsel for the respondents was later adjudicated on the date of adjournment before the court and if he appeared on the said date, he was informed that Their case was transferred to the transfer court, otherwise the transfer court immediately dismissed the application. The situation has not passed the previous action, but issued notice to the parties to the advice and counsel of the parties refuses to services when requested action if the lawyer for the applicants did not reveal any illegal action. The High Court, which was based on the correct interpretation of the leave to appeal section 24A (2), and O III, R 5, CPC, was dismissed. pakistani advocates Machh lawyer