Find a Lawyer

MESSRS ASHRAF SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER versus MANZOOR AHMED

Article 25 An Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Sections 46 (3) (4) and (6) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) for the rehabilitation of the term \ Applicable labor court restoration, circle The labor court's complaint was allowed by the Labor Court and restored from the job that was applied by the Labor Court, which was applied by the High Court, to the jurisdictional appeal filed by the employer. I was, under the provisions of section 46 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, that the Labor Court could only compensate this worker but not restore him to his service. Nothing was available to indicate that after the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, the Labor Court was unable to pass a worker's restoration order until it was considered a suitable and appropriate Labor Court. The Industrial Relations Ordinance shall continue to exercise the power of rehabilitating a worker to no avail under 20 02 In order to provide compensation to the Labor Court under section 46 (6) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, in lieu of employee restitution, Where his removal was declared wrong, as a substitute option, that could be demanded. In a particular case where the worker's rehabilitation was not considered appropriate, the mere fact that the Labor Court was also given the option to provide compensation but did not take the option of restoring the worker was merely a labor court ban. It was possible that the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the High Court's decision to appeal without the worker's compensation. \ R \ n \ r \ n family advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer