Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS AND OTHERS versus KHADIM HUSSAIN

Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Introduction of such application to the pre-discrimination right amendment phase Ai waiver, before the conspiracy to apply, was dismissed by the trial court but the appellate court Had rejected the same decision in favor of the Fairy. The impeachment judges and decrees issued by the appellate court were upheld by the High Court. There was no prior right to literacy because their land was not compatible with the land, nor was the petition sought. Limitation objections were never raised before the trial court and the appellate court. Was presented in the stage of the study and was not given any reason. The question of limitation can be raised at any time as there is a question of law for such relaxation but it should not be missed. Initially it should have been included in the litigation. The written statement signifies the fact that any objection raised by the limitation was never put into service, nor was any issue compiled. The question of avoidance is a question of fact. This matter cannot be reconsidered which led to its investigation into its original context. The question of the student's eyes was considered by the courts under which the High Court has properly handled the matter in its decision, which is unusual. Leave of appeal for no guarantee of interference denied. \ R \ n \ r \ n law firms from Lakki Marwat lawyer