Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAJID versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 324 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (a) and 7 (c) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Constitution of Section 13 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) ) Evidence of double murder daylight incident The relevant witness trial court sentenced the culprit for killing two people and injuring three people and sentenced him to death The accuracy of the case for the complainant came to light throughout the day. And was immediately reported to the police by the complainant. The previous rivalry between the parties did not exist as two people were killed in horrific manner, besides three people were injured by the alleged ocular. The version presented by the injured prosecution witnesses was fully corroborated by the medical evidence presented by the doctors, the prosecution's testimonies were submitted in unequivocal terms, Ed charged that the deceased child in his presence In an attempt to release her from the clutches, the accused brutally murdered the child in her presence and she was arrested on the spot, prosecutors' testimony was examined at length but not one of them opened their eyes. Didn't ask. There is no denying that the witnesses of such prosecution falsely implied that they were closely related to the deceased. My relations were hardly sufficient to exclude the evidence unless it was shown that the same motive was presented with a motive or an intention. The recovery of a blood-stained dagger was confirmed by witnesses from the Chemical Examiner Prosecution who reported the staining of a human blood, which was found in the blood of the accused. property advocate from Timergara lawyer