Find a Lawyer

SYED MUNTAZIR HUSSAIN SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY HEALTH, ISLAMABAD

Section 4 Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct), 1974, Rr 6 (f) and 10 Appeal Forms Appeal Nomination Appeal signed by a public servant by an employee filed by a public servant is dismissed by the Service Tribunal on this basis. It was filed by a lawyer and was not signed by him. There is no provision in R6 of the Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct) 1974; other than that, it is important that the memorandum be signed or the thumb is affected by the Government Employee Ground Appeal through a lawyer. Appeal about was not enforceable 25 Service 2002 was established by the Service Tribunal but the Registrar never returned an appeal memorandum to meet this deficiency, on which the Service Tribunal raised its objection for the first time. Was. 2/2 years later, when a government employee's service tribunals were heard without any recourse to the provisions of R104 of 1974, they were heard. Attachment to the provisions limiting the loss of public servants approved by the service tribunal was set aside and an appeal was allowed for a remand hearing for a merit appeal hearing. best law firm from Mamu kunjan lawyer