Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AND ANOTHER versus STATE

Section 2 3034/3434 The final outcome of the crime registered by the courts, based on the interesting testimony re-examining the evidence, was acquitted by the trial court while the other two were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. The conviction was pronounced and it was stated that the conviction of the two accused was upheld by the High Court through the accused that the only witness was the real brother of the deceased who was defending him and was not present at the time of the incident. Twenty-five were injured, of which eighteen were injured when the witness's brother was also injured. In the murder case was challaned, it would not have been possible to have survived if a witness had been present on the spot as the number of wounds on the victim showed that at least eighteen rounds had been fired. Were the only ones who showed the degree of venom poisoning for the victim. The number of person's wounds led to the belief that more than one person participated in the incident, as it was unnatural and impossible that if the witness was present on the spot, he would not have been targeted while the witness Another reason for doubting the witness's presence was that the accused was acquitted with the evidence, but another reason that agreed to agree with the accused's argument was that none other than Lalkar in the FIR. The accused, who was acquitted of the crime, was not declared a witness, but during the evidence, the complainant attributed the positive to him. The accused said that such suspects extracted carbine from their dub and opened fire on the presence of a witness at the scene. list of advocates from Turbat lawyer