Sections 161, 162 and 439 of the Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 1440 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Criminal Trial shall be used in Section 162 Cr PC Scope, before the police during the trial. Contrary to the principle statements, the defendant presented a defense witness who appeared before the police during the investigation and his statement was also recorded under Section 161 CCPC. During the course of the investigation, the complainant confronted the defense witness. Was not allowed, the investigation officer had earlier stated in his statement under Security 161. The CCP may only be used by the accused for such a limited purpose and may not be used for any other purpose. These words of the Legislative Assembly may be used solely to prohibit such statements for any other purpose. The testimony of the law was controlled by Article 140 of 1984. Under the prohibition contained in Section 162, CRPC and Section 162 CCPC, the statement under Section 161, CRPC Rico cannot be defeated. With the help of police, no evidence can be used as substantive evidence and can only be used under Section 162 CCPC to infringe on such evidence as such testimony. The testimony of the law was provided by Article 140 of 1984, when faced with, its statement was filed under Section 161 CCPC. Section 626262, CRPC rider may apply, but law unauthorized at section 140 of 1984, 1984, being part of common law evidence, may have its own personal legal utility and application to another previous statement of witness. Which maybe some people have mentioned
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
