Find a Lawyer

SHAKOOR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR

Section 107 (1) (d) and AXLI, R27 additional evidence, when the Appellate Court's authority is presented to seek additional evidence, to allow the Scope Party to appeal to hold the weaker sections of its case. Cannot allow or fill in evidence. The appellate court usually cannot travel beyond the trial court's record nor take evidence on appeal, neither can the party claiming permission to present additional evidence, but the appellate court in its sole discretion , Which is subject to the terms / conditions. O XLI, R 27, in CPC principles

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR v. FIELD INVESTIGATION UNIT (FIU) through Incharges 2013 PCrLJ 1
• JAFFAR ALI v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-IV), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2013 CLC 1
• MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 2013 PLD 8
• MOHSAN ALI v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, FAISALABAD 2013 PLD 12
• MUHAMMAD NOMAN BUTT v. CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD, LAHORE 2013 CLC 21
• ASHIQ HUSSAIN alias AKHTAR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 23
• Rana KHALIL AHMAD v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-II), BOARD OF REVENUE, LAHORE 2013 PLD 23
• MUHAMMAD ADNAN (MUHAMMAD IRFAN) v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE HAFIZABAD 2013 CLD 25

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Bajaur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes