Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAMIM AKHTAR versus FIELD INVESTIGATION UNIT (FIU) THROUGH INCHARGES

Article 199 (1) (b) (i), (3) and (5) the Armed Forces applicant's recovery of her husband in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court Scope Habitat Corpus Field Investigation Unit (FIU) The will, which was allegedly involved, was under the direct control of the Armed Forces in the custody of the Army Field Investigation Unit and no one could be ordered to be presented in their custody when the High Court jurisdiction. Was completely excluded under Article 199 (3). The constitution, where the High Court did not have the authority to order a person who was a member of the armed forces or wanted any relief against them, was allegedly in the custody of the FIU, who was in charge of the armed forces. Subordinate, the jurisdiction of the High Court was removed. High Court directs petitioner to approach relevant authorities for redressal of their grievance

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• SIDDIQUE AKBAR v. CHAIRMAN STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI 2013 PLC 1
• MUHAMMAD HUSNAIN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MULTAN 2013 PLD 1
• REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, PAKISTAN through Joint Registrar of Companies v. TAJ COMPANY LTD. 2013 CLD 1
• Mst. GHULAM SAHIRA v. MEMBER FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD 2013 MLD 1
• JAFFAR ALI v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-IV), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2013 CLC 1
• MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 2013 PLD 8
• MOHSAN ALI v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, FAISALABAD 2013 PLD 12
• SHAKOOR v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector 2013 PLD 17

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

ask a advocate free from Mastoi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes