JAFFAR ALI versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-IV), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Article 30 (2) Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition The accused accused of fraud in this case and this question was self-noted by the Member Board of Revenue to examine the member fraud question. For lack of jurisdiction and if he was satisfied that fraud had occurred, he was required to follow the provisions of the section. 30 (2) parties of the Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912 were to be confronted and provided an appropriate opportunity to defend themselves and after that a proper order was passed. The parties would never face the question of fraud. Member, the Board, unilaterally and in isolation considered the question of tax fraud and approved order directing under the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, as well as the restoration of illegal underground land, and this order It was fatal for the applicants as well as the defendants to not be heard and to give them their proper point of view. The offender was presented without providing a reasonable opportunity. The High Court reopened the land under the Board of Revenue, dismissed the order and directed the applicants to confront the respondents as well as against the accused of fraud, pursuant to section 30 (b), in their Provide an appropriate opportunity to present the point of view. The second provisions of the Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912, and the matter were remanded to the Board of Revenue, the application was allowed under this Act to pass a proper order.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
