Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAEEM BHATTI versus UMAR ALTAF

A. XXIII, R 3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Plaintiffs appointed a general attorney for the sale of their property The general attorney appointed a special lawyer who dealt with five property-related sale cases. The plaintiffs challenged the lawyers' powers of choice and five sales. In the same case, the parties compromised and filed a settlement in the court. The trial court dismissed the case on the ground that the suit for a majority of the reasons for the proceedings was bad and that the agreement was beyond the plaintiffs' claim. Was a legal agreement, substantially covered by the dispute between the parties in which the defendants agreed to cancel their sale and had to re-consider the issue in which the sale agreement was decided. Should have been heard, and the trial court refused to exercise its proper jurisdiction Ir substances on or irregularity was performed, and as a result was placed with the trial court's judgment and decree that the order in case of agreement recorded in the case of claimants patent advocate from Goular Khel lawyer