ZULFIQAR ALI versus STATE
Section 302 (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), the testimony of section 544 to repay its debt only at 10 o'clock at 30 o'clock in the night, when it had a dispute over the matter two days before the accused. The defense prescription, along with the natural behavior of a person, was more likely to be believed than the accused had previously taken. The prosecution officer initially denied only part of the prosecution's story, alleging that he had just seen the deceased in his home and thought he might have come to commit adultery with his wife. , But he didn't really seem to be taking that. There was also a background in the same case as the investigating officer mentioned in his statement, which was denied by the complainant on behalf of Posobi only to come to the accused's house to meet his wife. The incident was there as well and thus it was a family honor that honor killings should be discouraged, but that did not mean that the benefits of mitigation were not given to the accused at all. This case was certainly demanded to be committed if someone made a mistake in the house and invaded in secret to satisfy his lust. And his death sentence was sentenced to life in prison for not having an innocent dam. , Its heritage compensated under Section 544A, CRPC, was prohibited
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Topi lawyer