Find a Lawyer

SHAKEEL MASIH versus SHEIKH NADEEM PERVAIZ THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY

Sections 2 (g) (/), 17 and 24 relate the appeal of the landlord and the tenant to the High Court respondent, who had brought the appeal against the appellants, claiming that he had sued his deceased. Purchased the house as per the inheritance question. The original owner and the appellant were in possession of the house because under the former owner respondents, the tenants demanded service of the appellants with legal notice about the change of ownership and they were required to pay the rent. , But they failed to do so. Tenancy and claim that they have been in possession of the house for the last 60 years and they have given the building a boost and that the original owner or his legal heritage had no title to the house, In order to evict the tenant, the landlord is bound to prove the property was leased to the tenant. There were two types of tenancy. Was a contract. And the second legal respondent did not claim that it was a legal tenancy between the parties, because after the purchase of the house from the deceased original owner's legal heirs, he first stepped into the owner's shoes, no tenancy agreement Defendant, in his cross-examination, testified that if the appellant was the tenant of the house, he had no personal information, none of the previous owners, The tenancy agreement was entered into with, the respondents were not checked by the respondents, I was able to take the tenancy relationship between the parties, a advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer