Find a Lawyer

MST. RABIA BIBI versus BATI

Section 114 and AXLVII, R 1 Decision Overview Applicants for two applicants and respondents were the property owner's daughter's daughters and sons in the dispute The property owner gifted his property in favor of the son, The son said that the suit was filed for the elimination of the defamation, without the enforcement of the applicants, saying that the mutation was eventually canceled by the High Court and the property of the parties in the dispute was owned by the mother who died of her mother / property owner. Bequeath to all his legal inheritance by the heirs of The daughters of the petitioner / deceased owner were that as the daughters of the deceased, they were entitled to inherit the property of the deceased and they claimed that they were entitled to inherit inheritance in the property, even though in the case filed by the defendants they were parties. And was the beneficiary of the decree whereby the gifted respondents were declared invalid and that two applicants for review were also legal. The mother of the deceased mother, obtaining property in dispute as the deceased's legal heir. Applications are filed and it's friendly people accountable because that was passed, calling deserved shares equal to 2/3 of the total land owned by the deceased. The Material Impeachment Order was based on concealing material circumstances, which the respondents were obliged to disclose, which resulted in the suit land being diverted to the mother of the parties, including the rights of the applicants and their Will also include a third sister. Their mother top advocates from Dadu lawyer