Find a Lawyer

MISS REHANA KAUNWAL MOHAL versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, LAHORE

Article 199 University of Health Sciences Regulations, Reglan No. 2 candidate appeared in the Final Professional MB, B Section Examination, but failed because he could not get 50% marks in the clinical section, the candidate requested the High Court to apply. Count the numbers. Through internal diagnosis, he provided it clearly, instead of the internal diagnosis toward the practical part of the subject of surgery, 75% of the specific weight of the specific weight of Clinical Part Validity Regulation No. 2 of the University of Health Sciences Regulations. The medical components were 50 marks to be passed separately and the clinical diagnosis was not to be included in the clinical score. In the final examination of the MB, B section, the clinical part was theoretically separated and had its own number. Because students had to come to real life. For admission to practical life ??? In view of the important aspect of the clinical aspect of the examination, with the lives of the public, the students were not entitled to any K despite the adjustment from the other parts of the examination, even though no candidate had the maximum marks in it. Were obtained, however, the jurisdictional decision of the University could not be included in the constitutional petition \ r \ n \ r \ n top civil advocates from Kot Mithan lawyer