MESSRS WORLD CLOTHING COMPANY THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER versus HABIB BANK LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL- ATTORNEYS/MANAGER
Section 22 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 5 Suit for Recovery of Bank Loans Demand for Completion of Delays Limitation Act, 1908, Appeals for Discharge of Defendant / Respondent Appeal It was banned under the ban. The exact copy was applied on 11 3 2006 which was prepared against the Column of Delivery on 21 3 2006, 21 21 2006 which was mentioned thereafter and was terminated as 9 2006 2006 and Due to such fact, the delivery date of the date failed to produce the slip / mat issued by the dubious plaintiff's copying agency in which the expected date of supply of copy for the bare claim generally made in the application Even if he did not endorse the affidavit of the lawyer who applied for or received the copy, it would not be considered appropriate that the appeal be delayed and delayed. Had gone Appeal not considered satisfactorily delayed and apology request dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
