Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

Section 497 crime of adultery (Enforcement of Jewish Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 16), the grant of FIR shows that the accused and his co-accused, after abducting the complainant's wife, committed adultery. Comprised of a 53-day delay with the FIR filing and the accused was behind bars for more than three months and the invoice was not presented. The alleged abductor was not recovered from the accused or the co-accused abductor. Came to his own complainant's house and made a statement to the magistrate under section 11 under. Al had also included the accused's sisters and accused the accused and others of adultery while the co-accused was also presented as a guard. Police said the women and the accomplices have been declared innocent. From such an aspect it is clearly suggested that the statement of the alleged kidnapper has been exaggerated to some extent, suggesting that the accused was 15 years old, while the alleged kidnapper, who is the mother of four children. Thi was 40 years old, in cases covered under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 alleged kidnappers also filed a dissolution Had married her husband / complainant, in which she did not support the FIR story, there was no prior history of her involvement in such cases. The bail was acknowledged \ r \ n \ r \ n how to become a advocate from Goular Khel lawyer