Find a Lawyer

NASIR-UD-DIN versus SURRAYYA BEGUM

Section 15 Special Relief Act (1 of 1887), Sections 42, 53 and 55 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A. XXXX, RR 1 and 2 of the Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 26 pass The injunction sought against the defendants, for the past 37 years, restricting the plaintiff's right of passage and more facilities, which he had been enjoying for the past 37 years, was the question whether the defendants had the property. Is there any right to transgression for the purpose of abuse? Determining the accuracy of the deputy commissioner's road accuracy, the site plan attached to it, and with the writ petition order, the defendants' position that they were not directly abused by their property on the road was overturned, It is sufficiently clear that the defendants have nothing. The right to be abused on the straight road, rather than through the street only, was provided in section 26 of the Demarcation Act, 1908, which stipulated that any kind of relaxation on public property could be obtained only. d After 60 years while 20 years of uninterrupted use is required to facilitate private property, the entire suit property was called evacuation property as part of a public pool and the defendants were sued by the suit for only 7 years. The year before was allotted, so, there was no question. For any easement rights which have been affirmed in favor of the plaintiffs, the following orders passed by the courts were the result of incorrect reading and not reading of the evidence. Rev r \ n \ r \ n jobs for fresh advocates from Gojra lawyer