MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus STATE
Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468, 471, 409 and 109 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Bail, Application for Respondents FI Was not nominated in the AR and was neither a party to the matter nor a witness to the variation in question. The FIR did not mention any of the respondents' role, the respondent was an officer of the respective company and during the investigation a section P dismissed him saying that no men were found by him. Was. The crime against the defendant did not come under the prohibited clause of the prohibit7; CRP grant was a rule and the refusal was exempt. There was no record of any allegation against the respondents that it obstructed the completion of the bail. Had done In the absence of any basis for investigation or trial or the exception of the bail was misused, the request to cancel the bail was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Karachi lawyer
