Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMADI BEGUM versus ABDUL LATIF

Arts, 76, 76 76 (c) and 100 Certified copy of the gift process without permission to include secondary evidence Identity Defendant / Performer has no basis in Article (((c)) of the law before the trial court The petition was not filed prior to the determination. To prove the gift process through secondary evidence, a certified copy of the 1984 gift process will not be sufficient to prove that the gift work was lost. The legal data for the count was not sufficient for Article 76 of 1984. The admission of a certified copy of the process in evidence, but the court largely ignored the aspect that the gift The process is more than thirty years old and the accuracy attached to the same courts has failed to realize that the document presented on the record was not a gift. At the age of thirty, it was merely a certified copy. That was prepared just before the litigation could not add any analogy to the accuracy with the certified copy of the gift deed and the certified copy produced on the record was not admissible in the evidence because the pre-secondary proof entry The judgments of the courts below were not fulfilled legally best advocate from Talhur lawyer