Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AHMED YAR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, FAISALABAD


Withdrawal of jurisdiction under section 36 of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912, due to the jurisdiction under Section Civil Civil Code (v. 1908), VII, R 10, in the absence of the courts below The claimant had no jurisdiction to return. On the objection that any forum other than the civil court, the trial court of jurisdiction should have decided in such a case that it should ask itself whether the suit should have been dismissed because of the jurisdiction's absence. The claimant could not be returned. The following courts, which are not legally lawful, were set aside by the High Court and the matter was remanded for further judgment.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Sakardu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.