Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD ALIAS BAGGO versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Receipt of Evidence Both witnesses, even though they were civil servants, did not have anything on record to show that they had any sense or ill will or intentionally falsely implicated the accused. During the examination, the prosecution's witnesses were not advised that they had been lied to because of enmity, the accused himself did not dare to appear in court under section 340 (2), CRPC had Accusing the accused, the defense witness told a different story that had no connection with the defense's plea. The witnesses were persistent that the failure of the prosecution to produce independent witnesses was not fatal in any way, the Chemical Examiner's report suggests, contradicting the recovered substance chars was indicated by the prosecuting attorney, the official Was in connection with the damage to the vehicle. Of the minor nature that did not affect the admission value of the recovery witnesses, the trial court correctly found that the prosecution's case was a classification against the accused, but it did not include any sentence to pass. Denied that when the accused fails to pay the fine, the High Court has ruled that the accused will be sentenced to one more year in jail if he fails to pay the fine. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Nooriabad lawyer