Find a Lawyer

MST. HAMIDA BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL

Arts 72 and 78 Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 12 suit for specific performance of contract to sell suit was issued and order was upheld in appeal Proof of execution of minor witnesses in the document Was required to prove the document through two certified witnesses. The agreement in question was confirmed - through four marginal witnesses, but only one witness was presented who stated that he did not know the executor / defendant and was the only witness in the execution of the agreement, the presence of the other three witnesses. Was material, so the contract was not made. By someone who was neither a stamp salesman nor the author of a work. Nothing was in the record to indicate that the author was not available, the important thing being that the defendant himself applied for a thumb impression which was the effect of the thumb impression. In this case, the sale was different from that of the woman, no attempt was made by the defendant to challenge the report. Title for sale was not reached by registration. \ r \ n top advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer