Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MESSRS MUHAMMAD ABBAS & SONS

O. VIII, R 10, O XLIII, RI & 5 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Delayed in filing a petition for condolences, the petitioners have the right to file a written statement as a petitioner closed their trial court. Was filed against the order. Repeated occasions, failing to present their defense by filing a written statement, the trial court made no decision in terms of Order VIII, CPC of R-10, but granted the applicants the right to file a written statement. Later, the order was postponed. By the petitioners, contrary to the trial court's order, the appellate court had, on time, dismissed it from time to time, and it refused to delay the applicant's delay in view of the applicant's default behavior. A review was filed against the order dismissing his appeal approved by the court number. The judgment was heard by the trial court under Rule 10 of CPC, Rule 10, that the appeal filed by the petitioners was not permissible by law if the appeal could be considered as a civil review, the applicants were allowed by the High Court. After filing a disqualified appeal, the second amendment will be banned and then revised. The circumstances of the case did not justify changing the amendment to the constitutional petition under Article 199. According to the constitution, as petitioners prayed pakistani advocates Lala rukh lawyer