The suit for the possession of the Section 8 suit, respectively by the trial court and the appellate court, after reviewing the evidence of the parties, concluded that the applicants were illegally occupying the land belonging to the respondents. Are. The land was purchased by them or they were the rightful owners of the property, the demarcation proceedings were conducted and the respondents' land was demarcated without any objection to the applicants and the demarcation proceedings were conducted on another forum. I was not challenged and the decisions and orders passed by the courts were approved by the court. Neither the readmission nor the misinterpretation of the evidence was found to suffer the consequences or in the absence of any weakness in the concurrence of the courts below, the jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be interfered with. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
