Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus STATE

Testimony of Sections 302 (b), 324, 452 and 34 At the time of the appreciation incident, the complainant was not aware and on the basis of the victim's statement on the day of the incident, the accused were involved in the case, their arrest. Later, the accused was never put on an identity parade test to rule out the possibility of his false involvement at the behest of the complainant and witnesses, who saw the accused fleeing the scene, even though he was tried by the trial court. Had stated in front of them. The suspect committed the crime, but in the next breath, the complainant confessed that the suspects had shown him in jail, and that after his arrest, the identity of the accused was never identified in the parade, the complainant's The statement was filed after two years of presence and identity. After such a long time, the accused could not be relied upon in the court on the police officer, who recorded the deceased's death, both of which were never confirmed. Intended to correct his signature on the document and no such document was present or the presence of any doctor And was associated with the Ocular account the medical evidence was conflicting evidence dying declaration was full of doubt the case against the accused. He was entitled to take advantage of the suspicion and the conviction imposed by the trial court was set aside and he was acquitted of the charges and was released. online advocate from Warburton lawyer