Find a Lawyer

GHAZANFAR ALI versus STATE

The testimony of section 302 (b) cannot be ruled out during the strange hours of the night even when the complainant was present at the scene because he was a resident of the same area and there was a possibility of hearing and crying at night. There, in this case, when the complainant handed over the hand of his deceased daughter to the accused two months ago, the complainant was subjected to a lengthy investigation. But nothing was brought to record that he had any reason to falsely implicate the complainant in this case, who was a natural witness, only his statement sufficient to link the accused to the commission of the crime. Was the witness of another prosecutor, who was a resident of another village. The victim, who was five miles away from the scene of the incident, could not provide a reason for meeting the complainant during the strange hours of the night, saying the witness was not a bee n to offer any reasonable explanation for his presence on the spot. It was also proved that the accused neither appeared in his defense under section 4040 (?), CCPC nor did he include any evidence to apologize to the commission of the crime nor to the accused. Other family members were also presented to explain the circumstances in which the victim was killed. In view of the quality of evidence presented by the prosecution in the presence of his parents, brothers and their wives in his home, the case against the accused proved beyond any doubt, the trial court said through trial court. Approved, could not be interrupted. The accused failed to show any mitigating circumstances in order to reduce his sentence property advocates from Kakur Town lawyer