Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD CHAUDHRY versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.I, LAHORE

Section 19 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXI, RR 84 and 85 Separation of sale by auction on same day Not collecting 25% auction cost Impact of extension of time for collection of auction cost The highest bidder was 25% of the auction price six days after the auctioneer's jurisdiction, and the remaining 3/4 nine were submitted within nine days of the auction; the court auctioned in favor of the auctioneer. Refused to confirm, as it did not deposit 25% of the auction price. On the same day the appellant had raised that the entire amount was deposited within fifteen days as per the requirement of OXI, R 85, that the payment of the CPC validity made after six days could not be considered and immediately. Can be paid, as prescribed under O. XXI, R 84, CPC provisions of the law were mandatory because the penalties for non-compliance were provided under this provision of the law itself, Which stated that if the buyer committed a default crime in an instant payment. Out of 25 of the sale price, this property will be resold. The initial payment of 25% was not made within the time period set out under the OXI, R-84, CPC, and even the executing court did not have the power to make time to act. To increase. , Which was determined and approved by law enforcement court, was in accordance with the law and no interference was sought by the appellate court of the High Court. The same High Court dismissed the appeal while maintaining the defective order inheritance advocates near Orakzai lawyer