Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR HAYAT versus ATTIQ-UR-REHMAN

Section 364 A Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 417 (2A) appealed against the trial court, noting that no word was entered in the FIR because the complainant's nephew The complainant was kidnapped, however, in a later statement, it was held that the accused intended to kill the kidnapper. The supplemental statement was recorded after the interval of 3/2 months after the alleged incident took place, according to the trial court's statement that the prosecution's story caused doubt. , The trial court was convinced of the accused and the suspect was acquitted, giving the benefit of the doubt, the reasons which were tried by the trial court, the appeal against acquittal was dismissed. property advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer