NOOR MUHAMMAD THROUGH L.RS. versus CHAUDHRY MUHAMMAD BAKHSH THROUGH L.RS.
Section 42 sued the claimants claiming to be the owners of the land occupying the suit that they have purchased the seller's entire land holdings, therefore, the legal heirs of the shopkeepers have no right Is to separate the accused and exclude the case. The seller's contract clearly states that the entire land of the seller was conveyed to the claimants and as a result the seller could not own any land, nor could their legal heirs transfer the same to the defendant / administrator. That are of legal heritage under a legal estate. The shopkeeper obtained approval for the change of inheritance simply because the revenue record was not properly prepared to reflect the sale made by the seller, but the courts below were the only ones Revenue went through the record without appreciating that such a record does not work to create or extinguish conflicting interpretations. The result of not reading the evidence and not reading the false news was not lasting
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
