ASHFAQ-UR-REHMAN versus WALI MUHAMMAD
O XVII, R 3 The two adjoining cases subsequently set aside the dismissal of a case for lack of evidence, arguing that the plaintiffs conceded that they misjudged the date of the hearing, because both cases had already been run together, Therefore, they rightly thought that their case was also settled. To this date, as in the other case, the suits connected with the justification run almost simultaneously, the possibility of noting the wrong date cannot be ruled out, therefore, the High Court, in the interest of justice, appealed. Granted, the rights of the parties on technical skills should not be thwarted, but should be decided on competence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hub Inds Estate lawyer
