Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus STATE

Defining the evidence in section 302 (b), twenty minutes after the incident, a reduction in the FIR was immediately filed in which the accused was designated to be fired twice on the testimony of the accused. , Who presented the Ocular Account, had no prior hostility or was denied by the accused by the accused in making false accusations about the location, timing of the incident and the commission of the incident with the pistol. , But he urged intense and sudden provocation during a cross-examination of the prosecution's witnesses. The statement was filed under Section 234 Cr, CRPC, but stated that the prosecuting attorney did not, without any doubt, be able to bring the accused home, however, failed to prove the motive against the accused and the accused. Proved. At the time of the incident, the age of puberty, which occurred shortly before the incident occurred, resulted in the formation of a commission, which could not be ruled out because of the honor of the commission because of family honor. It has been reported that it is a great provocation, but has not been able to prove that in this case, arbitrary punishment can be used to reduce the death penalty. In keeping with the conviction under the 3030 (b) sentence of life imprisonment, the PPC convicted by the trial court changed the death sentence to life imprisonment with the benefit of Section 382B, CRPC. went. us immigration advocates from Peshawar lawyer