MUHAMMAD JAVED versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Appellant was removed from the job after issuance of show cause notice and given regular statement inquiry showcase notice with statement of some allegations against it. And based solely on the response of the appellant's showcase notice, he was removed from the job under unnecessary order and without any personal hearing, the seriousness of the allegations leveled against the appellant by regular departmental inquiry required But, the competent authority did not consider this through regular departmental inquiry into fact and arbitrariness The appellant was not heard as he was not given any opportunity of a personal hearing which was absolutely necessary in case of any adverse order sanctioned against him, the permission of the appellant, granted against the appellant. An unclean removal order was placed on the employer's direction of conducting a de novo dispensary on the same charge that action against the appellant gives him a full opportunity of a personal hearing.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer