Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Appreciating the evidence of Sections 2 302 (b), 4?4 and ? of9, statements of both witnesses remained on the previous rivalry and enmity, standing on the election matter between the complaining party and the accused, for repeated firing by the accused. Although no crime was recovered from the FIR site, the inquiry report did not mention the recovery of arms, the prosecution is hardly a modern case as no vacancy was recovered from the spot and it is not true. It could be said that the arms recovered were the ones used in the case of the accused, though they were fugitives, The incident was established, only the evidence was corroborating, and on the basis of conviction, it could not be said that the fugitive did not appear at the time the prosecution's witnesses were present and that the prosecution's case was not without doubt. Appeals of the defendants against the trial court's decision allowed them to extend the benefit of the doubt, the accused was acquitted of all charges and was released advocate for immigration from Feroz Walla lawyer