Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MASIH versus STATE

Definitions of the Sections 302 and 364 of the evidence were filed after about seven days in which the only suspicion was expressed, the accused was arrested on the same day by the prosecutor's witness / complainant who was the victim's father and the police While in custody, he confessed to his crime. Both witnesses admitted during their investigation that while in police custody, a confessional statement was made when they made a confessional statement that had no identifiable value, the complainant / prosecutor's witness, who was the victim. The father was, cannot be given any importance. During the cross-examination it was stated that the prosecution's second witness had nothing to do with it, but the FIR stated that the second witness of the prosecution was his relative while the prosecutor presented as a witness, He also admitted that he was a relative of the deceased and the complainant / prosecutor. Witness Complainant / Prosecutor's Witness made false statement to show the testimony of the prosecutor As an independent witness, the true witness cannot be relied upon to retrieve any independent testimony from the other area Was not involved in the proceedings, which, in violation of Section 103, CRPC, could not be considered an independent collision of evidence. The doctor, who conducted the post-mortem examination of the deceased, did not comment on the cause of the death of the deceased and referred the matter to a chemical examiner for comment, indicating that someone The poison was not found, the confessional statement given by the accused, did not help the medical evidence, famous supreme court advocate from Bolan lawyer